Tuesday, July 9, 2013

CMS Says More Evidence Needed Before Medicare Will Cover Amyloid-Beta Imaging


The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services says that evidence is insufficient to approve the use of positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid-beta (Aβ) imaging for Medicare beneficiaries with dementia or neurodegenerative disease. However, CMS did say that there is sufficient evidence that the use of PET Aβ imaging could be promising in two scenarios: (1) to exclude Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in narrowly defined and clinically difficult differential diagnoses, such as AD versus frontotemporal dementia (FTD); and (2) to enrich clinical trials seeking better treatments or prevention strategies for AD, by allowing for selection of patients on the basis of biological as well as clinical and epidemiological factors.

CMS in its decision said it will thus cover one PET Aβ scan per patient who is enrolled in a clinical trial that is designed to develop better treatments or prevention strategies for AD or to resolve clinically difficult differential diagnoses where use of PET Aβ imaging appears to improve health outcomes.

Eli Lilly, which manufactures the Amyvid (florbetapir F18 injection) beta-amyloid scan, in a statement on its Web site expressed disappointment in the decision. “CMS appears to be challenging the value of an adjunctive tool that can assist physicians in making a more-informed diagnosis for patients with cognitive impairment,” said Daniel Skovronsky, M.D., Ph.D., president and CEO, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc., a subsidiary of Eli Lilly. Restricting coverage could hinder a timely and accurate diagnosis.... In addition, it may stifle future innovation aimed at improving diagnosis."

The CMS decision is posted here. For more on this subject see Psychiatric News here.

(Image: travellight/shutterstock.com)

Disclaimer

The content of Psychiatric News does not necessarily reflect the views of APA or the editors. Unless so stated, neither Psychiatric News nor APA guarantees, warrants, or endorses information or advertising in this newspaper. Clinical opinions are not peer reviewed and thus should be independently verified.